e_moon60 (e_moon60) wrote,

  • Mood:

Breakfast idiocy

Sometime last week I was watching a network morning program, looking for weather, and the talking heads were expressing great horror over one-dollar fast-food breakfasts because they had (gasp) 300 calories!!!  Sometimes even 400!!!   And they had (gasp!) some fat!  and (gasp!) eggs!

I ran a quick calculation and thought "That's really stupid..." 
The recommendation has been that you eat at least 25% of your daily calories in the morning.   4 x 300 = 1200.  Not really a huge caloric intake in one day, right?   Even if it were 400,  and 25% of the daily total, that's 1600...again, not a vast consumption. 

The nutritionist talking head went on to recommend other
lower-calorie breakfasts that would, she said, keep you feeling energetic all morning...but which I looked at and know would not hold ME for four hours.   The much-despised breakfast biscuit (egg or sausage) I know from experience would. 

In my skinnier youth, I used to eat one or two eggs and bacon and toast (from homemade whole-wheat bread) every morning.   I did not gain weight.   I also drank more sugared soda than was good for my teeth, but I did not gain weight.  I did not gain weight from before 18 to about 39, eating whatever I wanted in whatever amount.  Two things:  I took hormones so I could breast-feed our adopted son, and when our son turned out to have developmental problems, I got a lot less exercise because I was on the floor with him most of the time, working with him.  My usual breakfast now is a cereal/nut/seed mix that I devised for myself (it suits the higher-fiber needs of the older body, 'nuff said)  but if I know I have a hard day coming up, it's eggs and bacon, thanks.  And I don't feel the urge to snack that hits me with the cereal mix about 11. 

I'm a strong proponent of a good breakfast, especially if you're a morning person or have reason to be up and doing and stay doing all morning long and maybe into the afternoon.  I think an 80 calorie or 120 calorie breakfast is ridiculous unless you're going to have second breakfast that's a real one in about an hour, maybe two.  I also think anyone claiming to know anything about nutrition should be emphasizing the value of eating a substantial breakfast with a mix of nutrients to give a quick energy boost, then supply a long steady working level that takes you into lunch still alert and capable.

These network morning shows are really odd about food.  I remember one where they were talking about saving money by cooking at home, and had a chef demonstrate how you could make your own nutritious beef/vegetable soup...and the idiot started by cutting up a sirloin steak!   Dear hearts, you do not make soup out of sirloin steak.  Not only is it a waste of a good steak, and the money a good steak costs, but it doesn't have that much flavor once you soak it in water.   

But anyway--it was annoying that the whole thrust of the "avoid the dollar breakfast menu" segment was on the horrors of having a breakfast with that many (300-400) calories.  

Tags: cooking, food
  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.