Unfortunately, such asinine behavior is not limited to the republicans.
Perhaps not, but when was the last time you saw a Democrat advocating the assassination of a President AND his entire family?
Heard more than a few of them making remarks to that effect when President Bush was in the process of removing Saddam Hussein from power. I also recall quite a few democrats of my acquaintance expressing regret that Hinkley was such a poor shot back in the day. Like I said, asinine people come in all groups.
Nor did I say asinine behavior was limited to Republicans. Interesting that you try the "everybody's doing it" defense rather than stating your opinion of the reported instance. Hmmm.
Speaking as a mother...that's a weak defense. I don't like mean-girl behavior whether it's from a liberal or a conservative...and yes, mean-girl snark is not limited to one political party. But nobody gets let off because "well, SHE did it."
Racism directed at African-Americans, however, is a right-wing (and in this decade that means Republican) habit. It's the Republicans who have said that President Obama isn't really an American citizen, is really a Muslim, etc, etc. Can't pin that one on the Democrats since the southern Democrat block switched parties '60s and '70s. Miss Wright's comment about President Obama was racist. And Republican. As the president--the public face--of the University of Texas Student Republicans, she's not just someone mouthing off to her sorority sisters (which is bad enough.)
I would not try to defend asinine behavior of a clueless college student. That task would be right up there with Sisyphus's. But as it is, once again, political election season. I'm reading in so many places biased stories that present one stupid or thoughtless political party member as typical of all members of that party. That broad brush tar and feathering is what bothers me.
I agree, Because they do it too is not a excuse for this sort of behavior. If you had written the piece implying that nearly all college students say stupid things in the protective bubble of academia, it would have been just as accurate, and just as narrowly focused.
Unfortunately, the alarm has just rung, and I must be off to the day job. Please have a lovely solstice holiday season.
That's appalling, but not surprising. I unfriended my own cousin on Facebook for a similar comment a year and a half ago.
As much as I love social media, the speed at which comments get posted and stay on the Internet forever is terrifying. Even if you delete the comment, you never know if some clever soul did a screen capture or printed it (as I did with my cousin). We as a people need to relearn how to talk to one another civilly rather than posting provocative "jokes."
I'm uncertain of your point here. Yes, flamewars and pile-ons are typical of the internet. Been flamed and piled on more than once, and those who did so thought they were justified. Anyone who posts anything but puppies and kittens and rainbows on the internet is likely to get flamed by someone...and Miss Wright is of a generation that has had internet access since at least middle school. So...she knows about things going viral. When it happened to her friend Miss Pierce, she thought it was funny. That kind of takes her out of the innocent victim category, even if she does get piled on.
Are you suggesting that the media should not have reported this? That it should have been politely ignored on the grounds that the poor little thing didn't really mean anything by it? If that is your position, I can't agree. The resurgence of open racism is highly troubling, and along with the predominantly right-wing hate-mongering aimed at immigrants, gays, homeless, etc. suggests to me that all such instances should be reported.
From my point of view--as an old woman, as a mother, as a veteran, as a citizen of this country--I find Miss Wright's behavior in both instances--her reaction to Miss Pierce's tweet and the public reaction to it, and her own tweet--appalling. It's not that she dislikes or disagrees with President Obama; it's that she expressed her dislike in a combination of racism and slander, and quite obviously thought she was being clever.
2011-12-23 06:47 am (UTC)
Re: pardon me, anon was me!
Well...her parents/parents' associates/legal staff can now instruct her in appropriate discretion, and while it may limit some options for awhile, it probably won't forever. There are enough people who agree with her (especially in a red state) that she'll likely have no real problem finding a spouse or a job--though maybe not the ones she wants most. Depends on whether she was actually contemplating hooking up to a political hotshot.
But you're right that the internet's various traits do make large pile-ons much more likely, and more lasting, than back when I was in college. It was much easier for prominent families to disappear indiscretions back then, and even in non-prominent families, the audience for idiocy was just not that large, usually. Thinking of my high school class...most of us had no way to get even 15 seconds of fame locally, let alone nationally or internationally, whereas now any kid might be the next viral YouTube video by doing something stupid in a spectacular way.
I thought you smoked crack rather than snorting it, but there again, I speak British English.
I reveal my ignorance about drug names: I've often heard it referred to as "crack cocaine" and do not know the difference or if they're ingested in the same way or not.
I'm not terribly up on modern drug culture (in my day there was dope, coke, acid, speed, smack and shrooms, and that was about it) so I actually went to Wikipedia to make sure that you couldn't snort crack. Apparently you can't, unless you have nostrils like a horse.