e_moon60 (e_moon60) wrote,
e_moon60
e_moon60

80 acres: the great species hunt

So far, I've recorded only species that I saw (or saw unequivocal evidence of, such as tracks or scat easily identified) without manipulation other than putting up bird feeders and putting out water.

However, temptation looms.  This it the eighth year we've worked on the place and the species count now stands at 783.   Raw ego would love to make 800 species by year's end.  I need only 17 more species--anything, plant or animal.  If it were a wet year, instead of a drought year, lots of things would be out and about, including lots more insects.   But it's a drought year.  I go out with camera and see only what I've already found, mostly...maybe one new species a week of insects, and there aren't that many weeks left in the year.  Also, the big stuff's just about all  IDed. 

So...there's collection.  "Sweeping" with a net to find additional insects (probably there, but not in abundance), and digging into dead trees and going out at night with a black light and/or moth bait.  OTOH, I'm supposed to be a wildlife manager, and in my own mind that means not hassling the wildlife (by, for instance, collecting them) especially not in a difficult, stressful climate situation. 

I seriously, seriously want to get 17 more species.  I'm sure we *have* 17 more species.   Doing a complete census would be valuable (for other people who are trying to restore land) and also census falls within the seven activities required each year.  But is my desire for another 17 species this year mere ego, or can it really be justified, and if so, what kinds of search are justified?

We shall see where conscience and science meet, on this one. 
Tags: wildlife management
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 16 comments